Skip to main content

Starhill REIT - Missed the boat?


Starhill REIT closed at $0.70 today.I blogged about Starhill couple of weeks ago. Then, it was trading around $0.68. After my post, Starhill dropped further to a low of $0.635.

I did not have sufficient capital to take a meaningful position in Starhill at the time of posting. And now that I have some additional liquidity, it appears that the boat might have sailed.


But as the (slightly sexist) adage goes, guys regret the girls they didn't sleep with, but girls regret the guys they did. Which gender perspective will my failed purchase of Starhill ultimately adopt? I guess only time can tell.


Perhaps it is sour grapes at work, but alarm bells were going off stridently in my head when i read Starhill's latest quarterly report.



1) I had estimated DPU for FY 17/18 to decline to 4.57 cents, the actual DPU was 4.55 cents.



2) Office space occupancy did recover as expected, with occupancy rising to 95.% from 90.7% in the preceding quarter.


3) Starhill's stake in Wistma Atria and Ngee Ann city contributed 62.2% of total revenue. Wisma Atria saw its tenants’ sales and footfall declining by 3.9% and 12.7% YoY in 4QFY18.


4) NAV dropped slightly YoY from $3.136 billion to $3.118 billion, mainly due to divestments in Japan and a drop in AUD.


Item 3) is particularly worrying. Such large declines in sales and footfall cannot be sustainable. Existing tenants may have to terminate their leases due to inability to continue operation, and expiring leases may have to be renewed at markedly reduced rates. Future vacancies may also take longer to fill as Wistma Atria becomes an increasingly hard sell to potential tenants.


So while Starhill is still trading at a huge discount to NAV, it is no longer as cheap as it was a few weeks back.


I may revisit this REIT if there is a significant correction, but there appears little reason for me to add positions in Starhill at current price, especially given its rather gloomy outlook.














Comments

Popular posts from this blog

As a Dividend Investor - I am having fun staying poor

Recently, there was a self-styled "master" who went around dissing dividend investing, saying things like REITS will chibaboom (his words not mine). Ironically, the master also invested into "growth stocks" like BABA and notably SE before its recent implosion.  Masterstrokes indeed. Dividend/income investors have borne the brunt of "have fun staying poor" taunts since the dawn of time.  Previously from the crypto bros and then from the growth investors. This is nothing new.  Every growth investor likes to talk about Tesla. But where are the ARK ETF investors? Where are the NIO bulls? Where are the BABA fanatics? Even a broken clock is right twice a day.   Good luck to those who retired on a portfolio of "growth stocks", hoping to spend 4% annually on an expected annualized portfolio growth rate of 10%.  Without dividends, one would have no choice but to liquidate part of the portfolio for meeting expenditures.  The damage done might never be reco...

Smoke, mirrors, bungalows and mistresses

People care way too much about a couple of colleagues fucking each other. The only people who should care this much are the aggrieved spouses and the family members who were hurt and embarrassed.  If you are not one of them, then shut the fuck up already. Who cares? The fact that they fucked or are still fucking doesn't affect you in the least bit. So quit the vomit-inducing moralizing.  But do you know what is detrimental to you, the hardworking taxpayer slogging 10-14 hours a day to make ends meet? 1)      That the Government apparently provides a special class of rental properties, one in which only a TINY TINY group of people may afford, in particular, those who can comfortably pay >20k a month in rent. Suffice to say, a real tiny and privileged bunch including people like, say, K Shanmugam and Vivian Balakrishnan. 2)      That the Government is happy to willy-nilly spend close to half a million tax dollars to make these properties "habitab...

FIRE by 2020 has officially failed

Back in 2015, I never thought I would have to work past 2020.   The idea was that I would have accumulated at least 1.7 M by Jan 2021 and would be comfortably returning 110k a year in passive income based on a 6.5% yield.  How laughably naive. The optimism is commendable but misguided.  Covid struck hard.   Several terrible decisions were made. EHT is bankrupt. A 50k write off.  Ouch is right. First REIT is trading around 20% of my cost price. Never again Riady. Never again. Yields have been severely compressed  with "quality" REITS, e.g., MINT, PLife, Ascendas REIT all returning paltry yields of 3-4% or, gasps, less.   With the view of improving portfolio resilience, I made a conscious decision to rebalance my portfolio to go REIT-lite (well, lighter) and increased my holdings in DBS, UOB, OCBC.  The MAS cap on banks' dividends does mean that these companies are returning 3% or less per annum.   Sigh.  All in all, pr...