Bye bye LIPPO MALLS

Looks like luck ran out. After much agonizing, I decided to cut loss at 0.200.

It was a painful exit but I decided to cut my exposure to Lippo Karawaci's increasing likelihood of master lease default. First REIT has also been pummeled because of LK's credit downgrade. However, I have elected to retain First REIT in light of its quality healthcare assets.

When I bought into Lippo, I was keenly aware that it was a speculative play, not backed up by fundamentals. Greed propelled me into the purchase, optimistic about making a quick buck off a penny stock flip.

Alas, one does not outsmart Mr Market.

Lippo Malls seems to be sinking quicker than the sinkholes in China at this time. The prospect of its sponsor unloading overpriced properties onto LMIRT to meet its debt obligations is a pretty daunting one.

Whilst it is entirely possible that LK's troubles may ease up in the future, and prompt a re-rating of Lippo Malls, for a peace of mind, I would very much rather take the 6k loss (-23%), and re-invest the capital into something more worthwhile (hopefully).

While all investors know that you can't possibly win all the time, it still sucks major balls to have to swallow a major loss.

Comments

As a Dividend Investor - I am having fun staying poor

Recently, there was a self-styled "master" who went around dissing dividend investing, saying things like REITS will chibaboom (his words not mine). Ironically, the master also invested into "growth stocks" like BABA and notably SE before its recent implosion. Masterstrokes indeed. Dividend/income investors have borne the brunt of "have fun staying poor" taunts since the dawn of time. Previously from the crypto bros and then from the growth investors. This is nothing new. Every growth investor likes to talk about Tesla. But where are the ARK ETF investors? Where are the NIO bulls? Where are the BABA fanatics? Even a broken clock is right twice a day. Good luck to those who retired on a portfolio of "growth stocks", hoping to spend 4% annually on an expected annualized portfolio growth rate of 10%. Without dividends, one would have no choice but to liquidate part of the portfolio for meeting expenditures. The damage done might never be reco...

Smoke, mirrors, bungalows and mistresses

People care way too much about a couple of colleagues fucking each other. The only people who should care this much are the aggrieved spouses and the family members who were hurt and embarrassed. If you are not one of them, then shut the fuck up already. Who cares? The fact that they fucked or are still fucking doesn't affect you in the least bit. So quit the vomit-inducing moralizing. But do you know what is detrimental to you, the hardworking taxpayer slogging 10-14 hours a day to make ends meet? 1) That the Government apparently provides a special class of rental properties, one in which only a TINY TINY group of people may afford, in particular, those who can comfortably pay >20k a month in rent. Suffice to say, a real tiny and privileged bunch including people like, say, K Shanmugam and Vivian Balakrishnan. 2) That the Government is happy to willy-nilly spend close to half a million tax dollars to make these properties "habitab...

FIRE by 2020 has officially failed

Back in 2015, I never thought I would have to work past 2020. The idea was that I would have accumulated at least 1.7 M by Jan 2021 and would be comfortably returning 110k a year in passive income based on a 6.5% yield. How laughably naive. The optimism is commendable but misguided. Covid struck hard. Several terrible decisions were made. EHT is bankrupt. A 50k write off. Ouch is right. First REIT is trading around 20% of my cost price. Never again Riady. Never again. Yields have been severely compressed with "quality" REITS, e.g., MINT, PLife, Ascendas REIT all returning paltry yields of 3-4% or, gasps, less. With the view of improving portfolio resilience, I made a conscious decision to rebalance my portfolio to go REIT-lite (well, lighter) and increased my holdings in DBS, UOB, OCBC. The MAS cap on banks' dividends does mean that these companies are returning 3% or less per annum. Sigh. All in all, pr...

The Unnecessary Job

Search This Blog