Skip to main content

Is now a good time to enter the Property Market?

It is a question I ponder repeatedly.

Property seminars routinely pop up on my facebook feed with catching captions like - "how to turn 1 property into 4 on a median income salary."

I tend to take investment advice from property agents with a (huge) pinch of salt. As AK loves to say, Never ask a barber whether you need a haircut.




Property agents will always tell you that the "only way the market moves is up". "The developer will never reduce price."  If the development they are selling is large, they will say how the large number of future transactions will prop up your property price. If the development is small, they will wax lyrical about the ease to rent or sell due to no competition.

For would-be property investors/prospective home owners, I suggest you disregard all the noise and judge for yourself the merits of any property currently on the market.

Here are a number of questions I find helpful when looking at property:

i. Are any adjacent/surrounding plots of land marked for development? 

One of the many reasons why the response to One Pearl Bank was lukewarm could be that its adjacent plot of land (white plot) was designated for an integrated development with a comparable, if not higher, plot ratio. Nothing shits in your face more than having a later development erected a stone's throw from your balcony.  Alternatively, it could have been its rather ambitious pricing (starting from 2300?psf) for a Leasehold project.

When in doubt, always consult the URA Masterplan - https://www.ura.gov.sg/maps/

ii. How does its PSF pricing compare with nearby developments having the same / diff land tenure? 

A lot of property agents may try to sell you on an absolute quantum pricing. A 800k 1BR apartment may look "affordable" at first glance, but the correction question is whether it is "value for money"? What if it is only 400 sqft in size, i.e., you would be paying 2k psf.

I visited Daintree Residences showflat about a year ago when it first launched. And they were trying to sell 1 bedders close to 1900 psf. I found it ridiculous, considering that it was a leasehold development. Even more confoundedly, less than 20 metres across the road sat a 999-year (practically FH) development Terrene @ Bukit Timah, which was going for 1400-1500 psf. The agent / tagger was not impressed by my analysis and stated confidently that the developer will not drop price.  You can go find out for yourself what Daintree is currently going for.  Lesson learnt - follow your gut feel.If you feel ripped off, you probably are despite the agent's protestations.


iii. How does its PSF pricing compare with developments in other districts? 


For example, Gazania, a FH development in Bartley is pricing its 1BR units at almost 2200 psf. On the other hand, you have (much) more central FH developments e.g., Arena Residences (16xx-17xx psf), and Lattice One (17xx psf).  Probably does not take a genius to figure out why the take up on Gazania has been, to put it kindly, dismal.


iv. Are you financially comfortable with staying vested for more than 3 years? 

Why more than three years? Cause that is when you can sell your unit without the SSD penalty (Seller's Stamp Duty). Furthermore, if you are taking up a variable rate loan, you must be prepared for the interest rate to move against you. If you are already hitting close to the TDSR ceiling (which is calculated using a 3.5% interest rate), then any large moves in interest rates, or sudden retrenchment, is going to result in you potentially losing your home to the bank.

So, as you can see, when it comes to property as an investment vehicle, I am as cautious as it gets. Which was why I was pleasantly surprised last weekend, when i chanced upon a new development in Clementi - Parc Clematis.  




It has been a long time since we had a condo launch in Clementi. The density of condos in this district is almost criminally low, especially when you compare it to condo-galore districts like D15, with their ever-blossoming "cosy", "20-30 total units" developments erected at some cul-de-sac of some dinghy, two-lane, bi-directional road. You know what I am talking about.

I have always had a soft spot for Clementi. It was the estate I grew up in and spent most of my formative years. Who could ever forget the old Empress cinema and MacDonalds at the MRT station.

Sentiment aside, what struck me first about Parc Clematis is the price. At 15xx psf (indicative pricing), the developer Sing Haiyi is clearly pricing this condo for mass market selling. Nothing wrong with that. What is particularly striking for me is that, despite being a new launch, Parc Clematis is being priced comparably to Trilinq which was launched in 2013 (nearly 6 years ago)!  Eat that, inflation monster.



Value for money - paying 15-16xx psf for Clementi - an extremely under-served, popular, relatively central, mature estate passes my "value for money" bar.  Indeed, you might have heard that some resale HDB transactions (on top of Clementi mall) already went for above 1M.   A+

Stack/Unit layout - I was quite enamored by the facing of all the building stacks (N-S). Not a single stack would have afternoon/evening sun issues. You can always rely on a Chinese developer to prioritize εΊ§εŒ—ζœε—.  What was less impressive is the dated design of some of the 3BR and 4BR units, which still utilize a long corridor for accessing the bedrooms, which results in a massive waste of space (unless you were looking for a makeshift home made bowling alley). However, it is noteworthy that some stacks do offer dumb-bell layouts and these are certainly worth looking at.  A

Surroundings - The good: Parc Clematis is situated adjacent to a landed estate enclave. The bad: It is also close to the AYE. The good/bad: It is within 500 meters of ultra popular school Nan Hua Primary. Good if you are a parent, or prospective landlord. Bad if you hate children (kidding) and school bells.  A-

MRT/Mega-Mall - Parc Clematis is also marketed at being 500 meters from the MRT/Clementi Mall (owned by SPH REIT by the way). I think that is a bit misleading to be honest. 500 meters measures a direct displacement. You do have to get across a bridge and at least one covered walkway to reach the mall/train.  I estimate it would be at least a 8-12 mins walk depending on your pace. But if you drive, then you are literally a stone's throw from JEM, Jurong Gateway, and the future Jurong Lake District / CBD.  A-  

All in all, I must say I am very tempted. I have been out of the property market since I sold Visioncrest in mid-2018.  Perhaps it is time to get back in.

If any reader is interested to have an obligation-free tour of the showroom, please feel free to reach out to the chio lady in the sticker below.

(This is not a sponsored post!)











Comments

  1. I found this post very amusing, especially the tone you used in your references. Love it. Haha

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Smoke, mirrors, bungalows and mistresses

People care way too much about a couple of colleagues fucking each other. The only people who should care this much are the aggrieved spouses and the family members who were hurt and embarrassed.  If you are not one of them, then shut the fuck up already. Who cares? The fact that they fucked or are still fucking doesn't affect you in the least bit. So quit the vomit-inducing moralizing.  But do you know what is detrimental to you, the hardworking taxpayer slogging 10-14 hours a day to make ends meet? 1)      That the Government apparently provides a special class of rental properties, one in which only a TINY TINY group of people may afford, in particular, those who can comfortably pay >20k a month in rent. Suffice to say, a real tiny and privileged bunch including people like, say, K Shanmugam and Vivian Balakrishnan. 2)      That the Government is happy to willy-nilly spend close to half a million tax dollars to make these properties "habitable".  Imagine renting out

As a Dividend Investor - I am having fun staying poor

Recently, there was a self-styled "master" who went around dissing dividend investing, saying things like REITS will chibaboom (his words not mine). Ironically, the master also invested into "growth stocks" like BABA and notably SE before its recent implosion.  Masterstrokes indeed. Dividend/income investors have borne the brunt of "have fun staying poor" taunts since the dawn of time.  Previously from the crypto bros and then from the growth investors. This is nothing new.  Every growth investor likes to talk about Tesla. But where are the ARK ETF investors? Where are the NIO bulls? Where are the BABA fanatics? Even a broken clock is right twice a day.   Good luck to those who retired on a portfolio of "growth stocks", hoping to spend 4% annually on an expected annualized portfolio growth rate of 10%.  Without dividends, one would have no choice but to liquidate part of the portfolio for meeting expenditures.  The damage done might never be reco

Is it finally the end of the tunnel for REITs

General Mood Market is expecting interest rates to hold after US CPI data came out on 14 November and pointed to softening prices across the board. Oil has also retreated nearly 20% since its recent peak in Sep 2023.  Are we finally reaching the end of the tunnel for battered REIT assets?  My gut tells me that we are at early stages of recovery although we may possibly still see a couple more rate hikes in 2024.  Nonetheless, barring further escalation of global military conflicts and an unmitigated collapse of the Chinese housing market, both of which seem unlikely but can never be completely ruled out, we may start to see a gradual recovery in DPU for REITs (as rental reversions go up but interest expenses stay constant or go down).    What I did in 2023 (Not to be construed as recommendations or investment advice.) Throughout 2023, I have continued to load up on REITs which (i feel) have:      i. Good sponsors (Capland, Frasers, Maple family)      ii. Comparatively lower gearing (be