Skip to main content

Freedom versus Independence

Most FIRE adherents are familiar with the different tiers of financial independence (FI).  

Starting from coast-FIRE, barista-FIRE or Lean-FIRE all the way to the peak that is Financial Freedom (FF), each level is usually characterized by a marked improvement in one's freedom to disengage from paid labor. 




FF differs from FI in that it requires more than just having sufficient passive income to cover one's liabilities, the elusive FF tier is only attained when a person has more than enough passive income to lead his/her Ideal Lifestyle without worrying about money. 

Consequently, FF differs from person to person. 

For a person whose ideal lifestyle is to live in a HDB flat and take public transport, FF is probably easily reachable. 

For another, FF may mean GCB, yachts, and opulent cars. This may require one to hit the jackpot with some sort of crypto-scam, multi-bagger investment.

That said, I do wonder, for the average Singaporean, what is considered an Ideal Lifestyle and more importantly, how much money is needed to provide sufficient passive income to fund said Ideal Lifestyle.  In other words, how much is your fuck you money?

Today, let's explore a few types of FF and the fuck you money required to fund them. I should caveat that the estimates below are purely guess-work derived from daily conversations within my social circle. It is by no means intended to represent proper research of any sort. You are free to disagree with them.

 

Monthly Expenditure

 

Standard

Middle class

Comfortable

Housing

$1,500

 

(e.g., 4RM HDB flat in non-mature estate)

 

$ 3,500

 

(e.g., 2BR condo in OCR region)

$ 8,000

 

(e.g., 2BR CCR condo or 3 or 4 BR OCR condo)

Transport

$ 250

 

(e.g., MRT/bus dominant means)

$ 1,000

 

(Small sedan)

$ 2,500

 

(Mid-sized sedan or entry level sportscar)

 

Entertainment, food, and travel

$ 500

$ 1,500

$ 3,000

Parental maintenance / Childcare

$ 1,000

$ 1,500

$ 3,000

Insurance

$ 200

$ 500

$ 1,000

Total Monthly Expenses

$ 3,450

$ 8,000

$ 17,500

Size of portfolio required to fund monthly expenditures (assume 5.5% yield)

$ 753,000

$ 1,750,000

$ 3,820,000

As you can see, even for modest middle class living, you will need at least 1.75M to keep it funded in perpetuity. And this is a simplistic calculation which ignores the pernicious effects of inflation.  Ideally, at least part of the passive income should be re-invested in order to maintain its purchasing power over time. 

The ugly truth is only a select lucky few can accumulate a 1.75M portfolio in their 30s or 40s, let alone a 3.8M one. 

For those who still wish to pursue FIRE, know what you are getting yourself into. 

Onward to FI my friends.

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

As a Dividend Investor - I am having fun staying poor

Recently, there was a self-styled "master" who went around dissing dividend investing, saying things like REITS will chibaboom (his words not mine). Ironically, the master also invested into "growth stocks" like BABA and notably SE before its recent implosion.  Masterstrokes indeed. Dividend/income investors have borne the brunt of "have fun staying poor" taunts since the dawn of time.  Previously from the crypto bros and then from the growth investors. This is nothing new.  Every growth investor likes to talk about Tesla. But where are the ARK ETF investors? Where are the NIO bulls? Where are the BABA fanatics? Even a broken clock is right twice a day.   Good luck to those who retired on a portfolio of "growth stocks", hoping to spend 4% annually on an expected annualized portfolio growth rate of 10%.  Without dividends, one would have no choice but to liquidate part of the portfolio for meeting expenditures.  The damage done might never be reco...
14 comments
Read more

Smoke, mirrors, bungalows and mistresses

People care way too much about a couple of colleagues fucking each other. The only people who should care this much are the aggrieved spouses and the family members who were hurt and embarrassed.  If you are not one of them, then shut the fuck up already. Who cares? The fact that they fucked or are still fucking doesn't affect you in the least bit. So quit the vomit-inducing moralizing.  But do you know what is detrimental to you, the hardworking taxpayer slogging 10-14 hours a day to make ends meet? 1)      That the Government apparently provides a special class of rental properties, one in which only a TINY TINY group of people may afford, in particular, those who can comfortably pay >20k a month in rent. Suffice to say, a real tiny and privileged bunch including people like, say, K Shanmugam and Vivian Balakrishnan. 2)      That the Government is happy to willy-nilly spend close to half a million tax dollars to make these properties "habitab...
2 comments
Read more

FIRE by 2020 has officially failed

Back in 2015, I never thought I would have to work past 2020.   The idea was that I would have accumulated at least 1.7 M by Jan 2021 and would be comfortably returning 110k a year in passive income based on a 6.5% yield.  How laughably naive. The optimism is commendable but misguided.  Covid struck hard.   Several terrible decisions were made. EHT is bankrupt. A 50k write off.  Ouch is right. First REIT is trading around 20% of my cost price. Never again Riady. Never again. Yields have been severely compressed  with "quality" REITS, e.g., MINT, PLife, Ascendas REIT all returning paltry yields of 3-4% or, gasps, less.   With the view of improving portfolio resilience, I made a conscious decision to rebalance my portfolio to go REIT-lite (well, lighter) and increased my holdings in DBS, UOB, OCBC.  The MAS cap on banks' dividends does mean that these companies are returning 3% or less per annum.   Sigh.  All in all, pr...
4 comments
Read more